Web1 giorno fa · central govt counsel for union of india. govt advocate for state of punjab. punjab & haryana high court. supreme court of india. 1y Web15 lug 2024 · Ajrun Pantirao Khotkar vs. Kailash Gorantyal & Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024) was referred to a bench of three Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court by a Division Bench. The reference was made with regard to the interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Since the law laid down in State v.

The decision in Arjun Panditrao: Admissibility of electronic …

Web• I did a case study on Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs Kailash Gorantyal pertaining to admissibility of electronic evidence (Section 65B) under the Indian Evidence Act. • I did a case study on Amazon Vs Future Group pertaining to enforcement of Emergency Arbitration Award in India under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration Act Web25. In the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal re- ported in (2024) 7 SCC 1, decided on 14.07.2024, a three Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to answer a reference regarding the position of law relating to the interpretation of Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, 1872. scotland dollar conversion

[Breaking] Certificate Under Section 65B (4) Evidence Act Is A ...

Web15 lug 2024 · Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal And Ors. Petitioner(s): Arjun Panditrao Khotkar: Respondent(s): Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal And Ors. Appeal No.: Civil Appeal Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024: Date of Judgment: 14-Jul-20: Court: Supreme Court of India: Act: Indian Evidence Act 1872: Justice: V. … Webi. Two election petitions were filed by the present Respondents before the Bombay High Court under Sections 80 and 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, … Web6 ago 2024 · The conflicted interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act) by two judgments of the Supreme Court was referred to a three… scotland dogs for sale